DIYEFI.org Forum

Sean, it's just you now, all other variants are tested OK. Then I'll consider that code adequately tested for general consumption and migrate it to the master branch. There's currently far too big of a gap between them... that's got to change! Ball is your court, my friend! I feel a need to "s...

baited lol I would have said "corrected" :) "MAF is laggy as hell and near useless for this, too." I had to give you a little bit of shizzle, that statement was a bit too prejudice for me to brush off hehe. I did a fair amount of research to make sure I would get *good response,...

Fred wrote:I don't use Arch, but I commend your actions! Badger Sean and Mike about their non-strict compiler issues

Which package(s)?

-sean

King indeed lol.

Maybe the R1 rail 15 feet in the air after jumping the irrigation canal, just west of the dunes in socal.... /stunt

A simple spec sheet can flex the firmware muscle for people who are not able to look at the code themselves. Typically a smart ECU shopper will look at the specs to see if it will cut *their mustard. If multiple products will make the cut then it comes down to other factors cost/bells&whistles e...

Let me rephrase, droping the clutch enough to come close to stalling the engine, but not hard enough to burn rubber.

Even with OEM ECUs, I have noticed that if you come off the clutch way too fast you can hear the engine knock a few times, likely to the decel effect you described.

Not so sure I would call it laggy as hell, ey?



yellow = rpm

You can probably gauge the weight of the TPS movement by the reading the MAP sensor at the time of change. IE the lower the pressure the more change in airflow you can expect from X % of TPS movement.

"You certainly *do* care about what changed!" Some algorithms don't. In my experience the most responsive ones seem to be TPS based though. Typically TPS is in the front of the chain of events so it makes sense. "MAF is laggy as hell and near useless for this, too." "Even MA...